We Count! So #whatweneed is to talk about the #shitweneed

Where does hope spring from? A progressive form of hope comes from a belief that things can be different, in contrast to the conservative form of hope, which is a vague trust that the existing institutions of our society will fix our problems. As I wrote in my last post – Australia is experiencing the death of this conservative hope but we are still awaiting the birth of a new hope. What I would like to put forward after a few weeks of discussion with many people is a proposal to nurture the growth of a belief in change in the Australian people.

So how do we build a belief in the idea that things can be different? My starting point is that hope doesn’t come from tinkering at the margins. It arrives when the margins come to occupy the centre. People are generally smart – they sense the limits that the political class and the system places on their voice and their ability to exercise solidarity – it’s why we are between hopes. People in their guts understand that neither a new political party getting a few percentage points of the vote or an unreformed Labor Party exhaustingly falling into government promising the business elite to take the Australian people on a journey of reform will achieve the transformation they seek.

Ambition and audacity cuts through. Many sniggered at Clive Palmer when he stated his ambition to become Prime Minister. His audacity, however, has attracted many votes. Earlier this year I remember speaking with a casual warehouse worker from Queensland. He told me that he was traditionally a Labor man but that now he was supporting Palmer because he had the guts to take on Murdoch. It was Palmer’s ambition and audacity that won the support of this insecure working class voter (and many others in Queensland). There is no hope without the ambition and the audacity of a big ask.

There is a place for realism in politics but it should not limit our values or our ambition to realise those values in our society. A proper realism is to start with the lived experiences of people and tease out an agenda for social transformation that accords with what they see, feel and sense around them. A proper realism is to work out a plan that builds on this – a plan that allows people to take action for this social transformation and to decide what action they want to take to further this social transformation. Continually telling people the limits of what they can achieve and expecting their ongoing support is about as realistic as asking for #fullcommunism now.

The first part of the plan is to consciously ignore existing political parties. We must work outside the existing political system. We must ignore the limits the system places on our solidarity. We go to the margins because what we need to change is the mode in which politics is conducted. This is about changing the script and the narrative not replacing the cast on the stage. For me the actors and what roles they take in this new structure is a second order issue. When you’re stuck in the middle of a Michael Bay production whether it stars Shia LeBeouf or not probably isn’t the most pertinent question. Can an existing party step up or will a new one emerge? I don’t know and for now I don’t care. To achieve a social transformation we need a new social movement.

To change the script we need to change the script. The language of this social movement needs to be simple and direct – perhaps sometimes even bordering on the crude. It needs to be language that people actually use. The political class has occupied the language of emancipation. They will only be forced from this ground once we have gathered together the language of daily life. We need to have a language that is not the language of the left – we need to speak like people actually speak with each other. No declarations, no manifestos, no proletarians, and no mass parties. Besides, our political language has already been sold off to the highest bidder any way and every time we use the same language we’re really paying rent to and strengthening the existing power structure.

There are are two reasons I want to post this plan to shift the anti-Abbott #bustthebudget campaign to a campaign unashamedly in support of a concrete vision for a different Australia here on this blog. Firstly, I have confidence in it. I want to outline the steps here in full public view because I believe that if this gathers momentum there will be no stopping it. I have full confidence this will work and it doesn’t matter whether a spook or a Murdoch mouthpiece finds out now. I want to nail this plan to the proverbial church door without giving a shit what high priest of orthodoxy finds out. Secondly, not many people will read it here anyway.

We Count! is a statement of universal agency. The “We” is you and me and everyone. It is about ignoring the demographics – the way our community has been sliced and diced into different segments and electorates to be played off each other like chumps. In the last federal budget, Hockey and Abbott stole ten Tim Tams and left us with 1 – now they’re trying to get us to argue about how we slice it up. Well f#%t that for a joke. And everyone already knows it’s a joke. We Count! is about starting a new conversation – we already know Canberra is #shit, let’s start to talk about the #shitweneed. We, the people, are going to decide whether something is #shitweneed or just #shit. And we are going to impose our will.

This a movement that goes beyond the limits the system puts on us to control us. The starting point in this movement is us talking to each other and connecting in a new way – beyond parties, beyond town and country, beyond identities. Because people feel the limits of the system – they will see when there are gaps and weaknesses where we can break through.

We Count! starts not with the answers but with the questions. You don’t get a big ask without the right questions. The problem with the left today is we have too many answers to questions that people aren’t actually asking. It is the answers of the people that will form the list of #shitweneed (as an aside if perhaps I’m being too provocative here we could also go with #whatweneed). Then together we take action for what we need. We impose our agenda on Canberra instead of them imposing their agenda on us. In union language, this is a log of claims for the whole country. This is ambitious. This is audacious. It is key, however, that we do not start with a pre-existing list or agenda. We need to start with a set of open-ended questions, which in plain English, go to people’s everyday experiences and how that does or doesn’t get connect with our political and economic system. It is these questions which people can answer online, at home with close friends or family, or in community/town hall meetings around the country that forms the foundation for the next stage. In terms of resources, we need three things for this stage – an online space where people can answer the questions, resources for people to go off and run their own meetings of whatever scale they want to shoot for, and volunteers/software to gather the answers and draw together the key common themes and experiences.

From there we have We Count!‘s second stage – the first formation of the list of #shitweneed and where we start to talk about what action we want to take. It is at this stage where geographically and sector-based groups are beginning to form. People are gathered to talk about and rank their priorities. This is about direct democracy. Online democratic software complements people sitting down and talking face to face.

The third stage is the end of the beginning of a great transformation in our society. What we should have is an initial draft of the list of #shitweneed and real feedback on concrete actions we are prepared to take. It should be open for everyone to consider. The threshing out of this should be done in a collectively edited document – groups can gather to consider drafts or elements of the list with a final round of meetings throughout the country to pledge support to the one or two page list of #shitweneed. Then things get really interesting. Hopefully action is already starting to take place but with the final list of #shitweneed it really steps up.

What might the list look like – I don’t know but it would probably have a few key themes with more specific claims contained therein – here’s a purely conjectural draft of headings (based on the 15-M and Podemos process in Spain):

1. Recovering the economy so it works for all of us
2. Recovering equality and freedom
3. Recovering our sovereignty
4. Recovering our land

Who runs We Count!? We do. Everyone and no one. Any person or group could get involved. If you want in, let me know.

What happens next? I don’t know. My guess is as good as yours. Without you we don’t count though. So have a vote on what you think the list should be called and tell me what you think the key questions are we should be asking people.

2 Comments

Filed under The road map to another world

Hope is dead. Long live Hope.

In Australia today, we lack hope. It is the missing ingredient for social change. There is no great love for our institutions of power or the ideas they espouse. The status quo reigns but only for want of a challenger. It reigns in weakness; battered, bruised and beaten. Most people no longer trust the concrete forms the status quo takes nor many of the ideas which inform it. Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under The road map to another world

Community membership

communitylogoThis week the National Union of Workers (disclaimer: where I work) launched a new form of Union membership – a community membership. From a personal perspective, in this post I would like to outline what I think this means for the union movement in Australia and the prospect of building for progressive change.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under The road map to another world

Calling a General Strike

Each day we wake up to the reality of the past feeding off the future. As each day is ushered into the present, corporate vultures repeatedly feast on the organs of the future. We rip off shreds of our national wealth and feed them to the vultures. Their hunger remains. We push more and more student and housing debt onto the next generation struggling to make its stand in the world. Still the vultures want more. We push the costs of ecological clean up to a future we imagine will never arrive. Still the vultures hunger. They will never be satisfied. The seemingly perpetual present of the Prometheus cannot continue. It is a cycle that dooms us to oblivion. Continue reading

9 Comments

Filed under The road map to another world

6 Reasons why Social Funding can effectively end political corruption

Shit is about to get real...ugly

Shit is about to get real…ugly for the political class.

While ICAC has temporarily suspended its inquiry into the soliciting and concealment of political payments, we have a chance to reflect on the systemic implications of what we we’ve found out. The roll call of resignations, suspensions and those broadly implicated in the last few weeks runs deep – former NSW resources Minister Chris Hartcher, former Federal Assistant Treasurer Arthur Sinodinos, Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey, former NSW Police Minister Mike Gallacher, Central Coast MPs Darren Webber and Chris Spence, and former NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell. It feels like a George RR Martin novel where the body count is extensive, the web of intrigue intricate and there are thousands of pages of plot still to come where the axe will continue to swing. O’Farrell’s unexpected beheading certainly signals the unfolding of chaos for the political class in the capital and the rest of the seven kingdoms. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Blog is Back

Need before Greed

The Blog of Claims is back people. I’ll resume posting on topics designed to get us to a world which is based on fulfilling the needs of the many as opposed to meeting the greed of the few. I’ve been on extended hiatus between getting married, going on honeymoon and getting in the swing of a new role at work. However, I’m now in a position to begin regular posting again so here’s the rules:

  1. The usual posting cycle will be once per fortnight – every second Sunday.
  2. Topics will generally be a mix of unionism with a hack effort at politics and economics thrown in.
  3. Individual posts will be between 700-1000 words (give or take 10 per cent).
  4. I’ll attempt to throw in a dash of humour where possible.
  5. All of the above may be broken where I judge necessary (for instance it would be pretty boring if I turned this post into 1000 words).

For for some extended reading here’s a dialogue I engaged in with ACTU economists Matt Cowgill on housing policy. Enjoy.

I’m also open to taking suggestions re updating my blog roll, so please let me know what you think I should add or delete.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

We’re no longer beholden to Detroit

To lament the death of the Australian car industry is to grieve for something which never existed. Australia has never been anything more than a branch office for the global players of Detroit and Tokyo. An industrial reflection, perhaps, of Australia’s subservient foreign policy. Our political class has never really had the courage or strength to take matters into their own hands. And so it continues with General Motors (GM) announcing the cessation of Australian manufacturing from 2017. The mainstream political debate is stuck between lamenting that this was an inevitable but natural result of market dynamics and that further public subsidies could have kept GM manufacturing in Australia. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under The road map to another world

Australia’s Kleenex workers – used for dirty jobs then thrown away

My union, the National Union of Workers, held a demonstration this morning at Southern Cross Station called the Fluro Fightback. Here’s the corresponding article in The Guardian about it, “Australia’s Kleenex workers – used for dirty jobs then thrown away”.

2 Comments

Filed under Just how stuffed the world is today, The road map to another world

Coalition’s job security campaign contradictions

Just what are the Coalition promising to do to increase job security? The answer is very little and there is an important reason why, writes Charlie Donnelly.

“If you want to hang on to your job and have job security you will not be guaranteed that job security under Labor because everything they say and do is pointing the economy in the wrong direction. It is only the Coalition that is going to make the decisions that get the economy back on track.” – Joe Hockey Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Just how stuffed the world is today, Uncategorized

PRISM and Hannah Arendt

My latest article is up at Overland. It’s a piece on the wider implications of PRISM against a reading of Hannah Arendt’s essay, Lying in Politics.

Leave a comment

Filed under Just how stuffed the world is today